Cases 1 - 10 of 289
Hawkins v. The City of Eugene et al
as 6:2024cv00951
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hawkins
Defendant:
The City of Eugene, John I-V Does and Eugene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Windham v. Dept. of Agriculture
as 6:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Corey Eugene Windham
Defendant:
Dept. of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Murray v. Head of Department of Human Services et al
as 6:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Head of Department of Human Services, Lane County Department of Human Services, State of Orgon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Eugene School District 4J et al
as 6:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Reed
Defendant:
Eugene School District 4J, Paula McCown, Jonathan Andrew Dey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Oden v. Ruble
as 6:2023cv01846
Plaintiff:
Dillon Eugene Oden
Defendant:
Lt. C. Ruble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buskirk v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01758
Petitioner:
Clayton Eugene Buskirk
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thompson v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01766
Petitioner:
Frederick Eugene Thompson
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yergler et al v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2023cv01545
Plaintiff:
Samuel Yergler and Nicholas Hollows
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Eric Eason, Eric Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
