Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Neroni v. Coccoma
as 14-3359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick J. Neroni
Defendant - Appellee:
Ellen L. Coccoma, individually and as a former member of the Committee for Professional Conduct, Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, Hinman, Howard & Kattell, LLP, a Binghamton law firm, Michael V. Coccoma, individually and as the Deputy Chief Administrative Judge in charge of Upstate New York courts and others
Neroni v. Coccoma
as 14-2381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick J. Neroni
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael V. Coccoma, individually and as the Deputy Chief Administrative Judge in charge of Upstate New York courts, A. Gail Prudenti, individually and as the Chief Administrative Judge of Upstate New York, Robert Mulvey, individually and as Chief Administrative Judge, 6th Judicial District and others
Maki v. State of New York
as 14-897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank D. Maki
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, State of New York Department of Health Office of Professional Medical Conduct, Justice Jonathan Lippman and others
Neroni v. Coccoma et al
as 3:2013cv01340
Plaintiff:
Frederick J. Neroni
Defendant:
Ellen L. Coccoma, Hinman, Howard & Kattell, LLP, Michael V. Coccoma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maki v. State of New York et al
as 3:2013cv01118
Plaintiff:
Frank D. Maki
Defendant:
State of New York, State of New York Department of Health Office of Professional Medical Conduct, Jonathan Lippman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sims v. Nichol
as 13-2817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Sims
Defendant - Appellee:
Estate of Doris Nichols, Susan English, Esq., Sue Nichols, individually, in her capacity as administrator of the estate of John R. Sims; and in her capacity as executor of the estate of Doris Nichols and others
Sims v. Nichols et al
as 3:2012cv00205
Plaintiff:
John Sims
Defendant:
Sue Nichols, Estate of Doris Nichols, Susan English, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
