Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
N. Harris Computer Corporation v. Eugene Water & Electric Board
as 6:2018cv02165
Plaintiff:
N. Harris Computer Corporation
Defendant:
Eugene Water & Electric Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frisch v. City of Eugene
as 6:2015cv01780
City Manager Jon Ruiz:
City of Eugene
General Counsel David Doyle:
Deschutes County
Defendant:
Eugene Water & Electric Board and Sponsors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ellen Frisch
County Administrator Mokrohisky:
Lane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene Water & Electric Board v. J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation
as 6:2013cv02265
Counter Defendant:
Eugene Water & Electric Board
Plaintiff:
Eugene Water & Electric Board
Counter Claimant:
J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Avista Corporation v. BPA, et al
as 09-70265
Petitioner:
AVISTA CORPORATION
Intervenor:
PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE, EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD (EWEB), PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1 OF COWLITZ COUNTY WASHIGTON and others
Respondent:
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. BPA, et al
as 09-70262
Petitioner:
PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC.
Intervenor:
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF COWLITZ COUNTY WASHINGTON, IDAHO POWER COMPANY, PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE and others
Respondent:
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Amicus Curiae:
NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
