Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Robert Garcia Nandin v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv03821
Defendant:
Bravo, Mr Broadhead, Dr. Evelyn Castro and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Garcia Nandin
CLAGETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00671
Plaintiff:
CHARLES THOMAS CLAGETT, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EVELYN CASTRO, NORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooks v. Castro et al
as 2:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cooks
Defendant:
Evelyn Castro, Adam Gonzalez, Elvie Metz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Pollender v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv01354
Defendant:
Mr. Bravo, Mr. Bravo, Mr. Broadhead and others
Plaintiff:
James Pollender
Floyd v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2011cv00084
Defendant:
Lt. Broadhead, Dr. Evelyn Castro, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Walter E. Floyd, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derrick Turner v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv08462
Defendant:
Mr Bravo, Mr Bravo, Mr Broadhead and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Turner
Steven Dean Jones et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv07430
Defendant:
Mr Bravo, Mr Broadhead, Dr Evelyn Castro and others
Plaintiff:
Dyami Gwinn, Larry Hutchinson, Steven Dean Jones and others
Monroe v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00070
Petitioner:
Joseph B. Monroe
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Diana K. Clay, Evelyn Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Jessie Walker v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv00834
Defendant:
Broadhead, Broadhead, Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jesse Walker
Ronald G. Bailey v. Federal Correctional Institute et al
as 2:2009cv02230
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Bailey and Ronald G. Bailey
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institute, United States of America, Evelyn Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
