Cases filed in Pennsylvania
HARRIS v. GARMON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv05584
Petitioner: JONATHAN F. HARRIS
Respondent: MARK GARMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CAVELLINI v. HARRIS
as 2:2012mc00253
Plaintiff: ROY T. CAVELLINI
Defendant: MICHAEL F. HARRIS
Garnishee: THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
HARRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51542
Plaintiff: WALTER F. HARRIS
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRIS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35124
Plaintiff: CLAYBURNE F. HARRIS and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
TILLIO v. SPIESS et al
as 2:2011cv00288
Plaintiff: PATRICK DANNAIL TILLIO, S.R.
Defendant: F. HARRY SPIESS, J.R., MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS et al v. CELOTEX CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv81967
Plaintiff: CHARLES L. HARRIS and EMMA F. HARRIS
Defendant: CELOTEX CORP. , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , FIBERBOARD CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84576
Plaintiff: HELEN F. HARRIS and HELEN F. HARRIS
Defendant: ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
HARRIS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68460
Plaintiff: TED F. HARRIS
Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
HARRIS v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2007cv67646
Plaintiff: EARLE F HARRIS
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?