Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 589
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01053
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jane Doe v. Aylo Holdings S.A.R.L. et al
as 2:2024cv03267
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Aylo Holdings S.A.R.L., Aylo Freesites, Ltd. Guardian Ad Litem f/k/a MG Freesites, Ltd. Guardian Ad Litem d/b/a Pornhub, Aylo Usa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Great American Insurance Company v. Fred, Will and Bill, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01990
Plaintiff: Great American Insurance Company
Defendant: Clark Construction Group - California, LP, Fred, Will and Bill, Inc. f/k/a F.W. Spencer & Sons, Inc. and Clark Design/Build of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
Sarjeant et al v. City of Long Beach et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Defendant: ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP., formerly known as ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., KM Industries Holding Co., Inc., formerly known as Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc., Owl Companies, individually and as parent, alter-ego-equitable trustee, joint venture, and as succesoor-in-interest to Smith-Amelco and Owl Constuctors, formerly known as HC. Smith Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff: James Sarjeant and Lucretia Sarjeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00408
Interested Party: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval, Inc. (sued indiv. and as sii to DeLaval Separator Company and Sharples Inc.), General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Scott L. Hultner et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2024cv00409
Plaintiff: Scott L Hultner, Geraldine E Hultner, Scott L. Hultner and others
Petitioner: Alfa Laval, Inc. (sued indiv. and as sii to DeLaval Separator Company and Sharples Inc.)
Interested Party: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., General Electric Company, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as succesor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.) and others
Defendant: Paramount Global, Redco Corporation, Air and Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01100
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Eric White v. Brooge Energy Limited et al
as 2:2024cv00959
Plaintiff: Eric White
Defendant: Brooge Energy Limited f/k/a Brooge Holdings Limited f/k/a Twelve Seas Investment Company, Nicolaas L. Pardenkooper, Saleh Yammout and others
Cloud Systems Holdco IP LLC v. Carrier Global Corporation
as 8:2023cv02269
Plaintiff: Cloud Systems Holdco IP LLC
Defendant: Carrier Global Corporation f/k/a Interlogix, Carrier Global Corporation and Interlogix
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?