Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Ovalle v. Lion Pavers Construction LLC, et al
as 8:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Luis F. Ovalle
Defendant:
Lion Pavers Construction LLC,, Jose Bandeira and Lion Pavers Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Damaris Quinn v. Management and Training Corp., et al
as 15-60448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMARIS QUENTEZ QUINN
Defendant - Appellee:
MANAGEMENT AND TRAINING CORPORATION, WARDEN FRANK SHAW, WARDEN R. RICE and others
Quinn v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00738
Plaintiff:
Damaris Quentez Quinn
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Frank Shaw, R. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. EMCF Host of Staff Security et al
as 3:2014cv00392
Plaintiff:
Johnny Powell
Defendant:
EMCF Host of Staff Security, F. Ovalle, Officer Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Shaw et al
as 3:2013cv01043
Plaintiff:
Eric Ward
Defendant:
Frank Shaw , D. Smith, F. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Shaw et al
as 4:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Eric Ward
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Simone Jones, D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Jones et al
as 3:2013cv00509
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Simone Jones , R. Davis , Catherine Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Ovalle et al
as 4:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
F. Ovalle, F. Rice, MTC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Houston et al
as 3:2013cv00449
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Tonya Houston , Christopher Wansley, R. Pepper Crutcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Davis et al
as 3:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
R. Davis, S. Dunn, C. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
