Cases 1 - 10 of 12
F.S.L. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana et al
as 1:2019cv00068
Defendant:
Doe Individuals 6-50, Boy Scouts of America, Capuchin Franciscans Custody of Star of the Sea and others
Plaintiff:
F.S.L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abrahams v. Warden, F.S.L. Jesup
as 2:2018cv00093
Petitioner:
Daniel Orlando Abrahams
Respondent:
Warden, F.S.L. Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Franklin Williams v. Warden F.S.L. Jesup, GA
as 17-13053
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN F.S.L. JESUP, GA
Williams v. Warden, F.S.L. Jesup
as 5:2016cv00001
Petitioner:
Franklin L. Williams
Respondent:
Warden, F.S.L. Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Powell v. Warden F.S.L. Jesup, GA
as 2:2015cv00158
Petitioner:
Darryl Lamar Powell
Respondent:
Warden F.S.L. Jesup, GA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Warden F.S.L. Jesup Georgia
as 2:2015cv00117
Petitioner:
Franklin L. Williams
Respondent:
Warden, F.S.L. Jesup Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Warden F.S.L. Jesup, GA
as 5:2015cv00063
Petitioner:
Franklin L. Williams
Respondent:
Warden F.S.L. Jesup, GA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walter Guilbeault v. Anthony Haynes, et al
as 11-10396
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER GUILBEAULT
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HAYNES, Warden of Jesup, F.S.L.; in his individual capacity, F. ADAIR, Mid Level Practitioner; in his individual capacity, C. D. LIBERO, Health Services; in his individual capacity and others
Conti v. Shartle et al
as 4:2010cv01659
Petitioner:
Frederick Conti
Respondent:
J.T. Shartle and Federal Institution at F.S.L. Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Callier v. Shartle et al
as 1:2010cv00524
Petitioner:
Tariton A. Callier
Respondent:
J.T. Shartle and The Federal Institution at F.S.L. Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
