Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Devabhaktuni v. Fish et al
as 3:2020cv01633
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, Rebecca Rutherford, Sidney A Fitzwater and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deng v. FBI Agencies
as 2:2020cv00154
Plaintiff:
Lual Marko Deng
Defendant:
FBI Agencies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodards v. Federal Clerks et al
as 1:2020cv00100
Defendant:
Wesley Hendrix, FBI, Federal Clerks and others
Plaintiff:
Tre Von A Woodards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodards v. Federal Clerks et al
as 1:2020cv00092
Defendant:
FBI and Federal Clerks
Plaintiff:
Tre Von A Woodards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar v. The United States et al
as 5:2020cv00364
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Salazar
Defendant:
FBI, The United States and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lugo v. Barr
as 3:2019cv00353
Defendant:
FBI
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Lugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Devabhaktuni et al v. Mohankravi et al
as 3:2019cv02631
Defendant:
Apple, Kroger, The Colony Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Kushal Ravi, Trayee Ravi and Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Sanfilippo Estates v. Mortenson Stevenson CIA et al
as 3:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Mortenson Stevenson CIA and Polygamy Roaching FBI files
Plaintiff:
The Sanfilippo Estates
Not Yet Classified:
In Regards To Emille Volf Mortenson Cia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Clark et al
as 5:2019cv00675
Defendant:
unnamed/unknown black male, The City of San Antonio (San Antonio Police Department), Officer Robert Ferguson and others
Plaintiff:
Lane Smith and Jennifer Taylor-Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Civil Rights Project et al
as 4:2018cv03551
Defendant:
Civil Rights Project, 7031 Koll Center, US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Lord of the Streets Raymond E Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
