Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Hopson v. Spencer et al
as 3:2012cv00744
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Ruth Spencer, Commonwealth Attorneys Office, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Hopson v. Briesher et al
as 3:2012cv00729
Plaintiff:
Dendre Hopson
Defendant:
Steve Briesher, Ron Smith, Kentucky Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Shakes et al
as 3:2012cv00722
Plaintiff:
Deandre Hopson
Defendant:
James Shakes, Interchange Law Offices, Frank Mascagni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caucasian Bureau Investigation et al v. The People et al
as 4:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Caucasian Bureau Investigation, George Kevin Quinn and Jadon Robert Quinn
Defendant:
The People, United States of America, Jay Wethington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2011cv00370
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Montgomery and The Family of Robert L. Montgomery
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky and FBI Police Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bryan et al v. Security Equipment Corp. et al
as 3:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
T. Terell Bryan, Marcus Corley and Jonathan D. Simmons, III
Defendant:
Security Equipment Corp., Defense Technology Corp of America, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stevens v. Obama et al
as 3:2010cv00298
Plaintiff:
Archer Lee Stevens
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Daniel T. Goyette, Steve Beshear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. FBI
as 3:2008cv00438
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Montgomery
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scott v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2007cv00497
Plaintiff:
Chairayle A. Scott
Defendant:
Shannon Harris, Rivera Polk, Michael Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
