Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ulloa v. Warden of FCI-Fort Dix
as 3:2023cv01986
Petitioner:
Alex Ulloa
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RYZINSKI v. USA
as 1:2022cv00324
Petitioner:
ADAM GREGORY RYZINSKI
Respondent:
WARDEN OF FCI FORT DIX, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kosalek o/b/o King v. Warden of FCI-Fort Dix et al
as 1:2021cv00006
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Fort Dix and United States of America
Petitioner:
Jacqueline Kosalek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KEYES v. FCI FORT DIX et al
as 2:2013cv04256
Petitioner:
ANDRE KEYES
Respondent:
FCI FORT DIX, DONNA ZICKENFOOSE and A. BOYCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BANKS v. REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, et al.
as 2:2013cv01025
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, JIM SPROUT, CASE MANAGER ANESBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Realty Counseling Company et al
as 1:2013cv01784
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Realty Counseling Company, Jim Sprout, Anesburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. FCI Fort Dix Legal Department et al
as 1:2011cv00956
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
FCI Fort Dix Legal Department, Supervisor, Attorney Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. Wagner et al
as 1:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
Wagner, Dixon, Donna Zickefiose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
