Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 15-3578
Petitioner:
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND and CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NC v. FCC, et al
as 15-3555
Petitioner:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State of TN v. FCC, et al
as 15-3291
Petitioner:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Antoine Ray v. Bragg, et al
as 12-5880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE MARQUIS RAY
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRANCE BRAGG, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and others
Antoine Ray v. Ron Simmons, et al
as 12-5861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE MARQUIS RAY
Defendant - Appellee:
RON SIMMONS, N.A.A.C.P., CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Ray v. Bragg
as 1:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
Antoine Marquis Ray
Defendant:
Terrance Bragg, Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Communications Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ray v. Simmons et al
as 1:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Antoine Marquis Ray
Defendant:
Ron Joseph Simmons, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allband Communications Coopera v. FCC, et al
as 11-4435
Petitioner:
ALLBAND COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Public Utilities Commission of v. FCC, et al
as 11-4358
Petitioner:
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ray v. Federal Communications Commission
as 1:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Antoine Ray
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission, 2002 Congress, Senate & House of Representative and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
