Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lytle v. Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2022cv00248
Petitioner:
Robert Larry Lytle
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wooten v. Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Wooten
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Macklin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020cv00379
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Quintana, Lieutenant Barker and others
Petitioner:
Otis James Macklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemons v. Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2020cv00196
Plaintiff:
Antonio Clemons
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Lexington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Federal Medical Center, Lexington, KY
as 5:2018cv00654
Petitioner:
Larry D. Hill, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center, Lexington, KY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Quarles v. Quintana
as 5:2018cv00472
Petitioner:
Marlon D Quarles
Respondent:
Warden, Federal Medical Center Lexington and Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alcorn v. Warden, Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2018cv00455
Defendant:
Warden, Federal Medical Center Lexington
Plaintiff:
Glenn Ray Alcorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Patrick v. Warden
as 5:2018cv00445
Respondent:
Warden and Warden, Federal Medical Center Lexington
Petitioner:
George Edward Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Westine v. Warden, Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2018cv00289
Petitioner:
John G. Westine
Respondent:
Warden, Federal Medical Center Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Petrovic v. Federal Medical Center, Lexington, KY et al
as 5:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Jovica Petrovic
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center, Lexington, KY, Goodwin, Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
