Cases 21 - 30 of 36
DANIEL v. DOUGHERTY et al
as 2:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
JACK DANIEL
Defendant:
FRANCIS DOUGHERTY and FEDEX FREIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SANDS v. FEDERAL GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04733
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY SANDS
Defendant:
FEDERAL GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM INC., FEDEX FREIGHT INC., FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fedex Freight Inc v. NLRB
as 15-2712
Petitioner:
FEDEX FREIGHT INC
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Lumor et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2015cv00561
Plaintiff:
Stephen K. Lumor and Eunice Abiemo
Defendant:
Joseph C. Reynolds and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
NLRB v. Fedex Freight Inc
as 15-2585
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
FEDEX FREIGHT INC
ZIEGLER v. FED EX FREIGHT COMPANY et al
as 2:2015cv03332
Plaintiff:
SHARON ZIEGLER
Defendant:
FED EX FREIGHT COMPANY , TAREQ K. BRAGG , ABC ENTITY 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THE ORTHOPEDIC GROUP, P.A. v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE & HEALTH et al
as 2:2015cv02712
Plaintiff:
THE ORTHOPEDIC GROUP, P.A.
Defendant:
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE & HEALTH , FEDEX CORP. , FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SULLIVAN v. ESPOSITO et al
as 2:2015cv02708
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SULLIVAN
Defendant:
PETER D. ESPOSITO , FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. , JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAN v. FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02276
Plaintiff:
HOSUK HAN
Defendant:
FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. , JOHN DOE 1-5 and ABC COMPANY 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOVIDIO et al v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2014cv01696
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. DOVIDIO and DENISE M. DOVIDIO
Defendant:
RAY TAYLOR , FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION , FEDEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
