Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Moitoso et al v. FMR LLC et al
as 1:2018cv12122
Defendant:
FMR LLC Retirement Committee, FMR LLC, John and Jane Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Moitoso, Mary Lee Torline, Tim Lewis and others
Not Classified By Court:
Judge M. Page Kelley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Lawson, et al v. FMR LLC, et al
as 10-2240
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JACKIE HOSANG LAWSON and JONATHAN M. ZANG
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
FMR CO., INC., f/k/a FMR Corporation, FMR CO., INC., FMR CORPORATION, d/b/a Fidelity Investments and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
ROSE, CHINITZ & ROSE
Lawson v. FMR LLC
as 10-1944
Respondent:
JACKIE HOSANG LAWSON and JONATHAN M. ZANG
Petitioner:
FMR LLC, d/b/a Fidelity Investments, FMR CORPORATION, d/b/a Fidelity Investments, FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC., d/b/a Fidelity Investments and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rugg et al v. FMR Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01952
Plaintiff:
Stephen H. Rugg and Patricia Rugg
Defendant:
FMR Co., Inc., Strategic Advisers, Inc., Matthew Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zang v. Fidelity Management & Research Company et al
as 1:2008cv10758
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M. Zang and Jonathan M. Zang
Defendant:
Fidelity Management & Research Company, FMR Co., Inc. and FMR LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Kurz et al v. Fidelity Management & Research Company et al
as 3:2007cv00709
Plaintiff:
David Kurz and Raymond Heinzl
Defendant:
Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Kurz v. Fidelity Management & Research Company et al
as 3:2007cv00592
Plaintiff:
David Kurz
Defendant:
Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
