Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Powell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maida v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Maida
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Joel Bell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Isom D Rogers, III
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Petitioner:
Antoine Jackson, DeMariol Byrd, Donte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cooley v. (lnu) et al
as 5:2022cv03149
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Cooley
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu), Ida Smootz, (fnu) Zimbicky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bunting et al
as 5:2021cv03078
Defendant:
B. Phralcornklen, (fnu) Coleman, (fnu) Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Lamont Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirkland v. Fugate et al
as 8:2017cv02407
Plaintiff:
Steven Kirkland
Defendant:
Alexandra Fugate, Bernie McCabe, Alexsis Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muldrow v. Sessions, et al
as 1:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Lealon (Amir Musa) Muldrow
Defendant:
Jefferson B Sessions, III, Thomas Kane, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muldrow et al v. Batts et al
as 1:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lealon (Amir Musa) Muldrow, Suleiman Zakaria and Abdul Aziz
Defendant:
Myron Batts, FNU Underwood, Dawn Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
