Cases 1 - 10 of 43
McKinney v. Camara, et al.
as 26-5682
Plaintiff:
KEITH MCKINNEY
Defendant:
GINA CAMARA, SHOKO BURKETT, other FNU Burkett and FNU HAYES
Detherage v. Hayes et al
as 5:2026cv00835
Plaintiff:
Joshua T Detherage
Defendant:
FNU Hayes and Karen Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Detherage v. Hayes et al
as 4:2026cv00201
Plaintiff:
Joshua T Detherage
Defendant:
FNU Hayes and Karen Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinney v. Camara et al
as 1:2026cv00135
Plaintiff:
Keith McKinney
Defendant:
Dr. Gina Camara, Dr. FNU Burkett and Dr. FNU Hayes
Interested Party:
State of Hawaii Litigation Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leavell v. Talmage et al
as 2:2025cv04144
Plaintiff:
Traveon Leavell
Defendant:
Dylan L Talmage, Anthony Wise, Fnu Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross et al v. Harpe et al
as 5:2025cv00472
Plaintiff:
Danielle Ross and Rachel Macon
Defendant:
Kameron Harvanek, Brittany Chastang, FNU Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Sumter County et al
as 5:2024cv00490
Defendant:
FNU Munsey, Sumter County, FNU Ried and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Patrick Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Sumter County Florida et al
as 5:2024cv00495
Defendant:
Sumter County Florida, FNU Reid, FNU Strickland and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Patrick Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maike v. Hayes
as 5:2024cv03133
Petitioner:
Michael Maike
Respondent:
(fnu) Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stewart v. Sumter County, Florida et al
as 5:2024cv00342
Defendant:
FNU Strickland, Bill Farmer, FNU Locherie and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Patrick Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
