Cases 71 - 80 of 82
Tempest Fisheries, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-2001
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEMPEST FISHERIES, LTD, GRACE FISHING, INC., ROANOKE FISH CO., INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
New Hampshire Commercial, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1987
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, DAVID ARIPOTCH, RICHARD GRACHEK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
City of New Bedford, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1952
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW BEDFORD, MA and GLOUCESTER, MA
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE LUBCHENCO, Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA) and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
Lovgren v. Locke, et al
as 11-1964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LOVGREN
Plaintiff:
NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
KAHEA et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2011cv00474
Plaintiff:
KAHEA and Food & Water Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Michael D. Tosatto, Eric C. Schwaab and others
Cause Of Action: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Locke, et al v. Food & Water Watch
as 11-1303
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Defendant:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATOMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE LUBCHENCO, Administrator of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
Movant - Appellant:
FOOD & WATER WATCH, INC.
Interested Party:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY and others
Abbott et al v. Salazar et al
as 4:2010cv01759
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Abbott and Food & Water Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
Kenneth Salazar , Michael Saucier and BHP Billiton Petroleum (Deepwater) Inc.
Intervenor_defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
GULF RESTORATION NETWORK, INC. et al v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE et al
as 1:2009cv01883
Plaintiff:
GULF RESTORATION NETWORK, INC., GULF RESTORATION NETWORK, INC., FOOD & WATER WATCH and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, JAMES W. BALSIGER, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2008cv11149
Plaintiff:
Food & Water Watch, Inc. and Food & Water Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pete Geren, Colonel Curtis Thalken and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FOOD & WATER WATCH v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2008cv00720
Plaintiff:
FOOD & WATER WATCH
Defendant:
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
