Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56408
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, SONIA ANGELL, Dr., Director of the California Department of Public Health and KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, THE HUMANE LEAGUE, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTH AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF UTAH and others
National Association of Convenience Stores et al v. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene et al
as 1:2017cv05324
Plaintiff: National Association of Convenience Stores , New York Association of Convenience Stores , Food Marketing Institute and others
Defendant: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene , New York City Board of Health , Mary Travis Bassett and others
Amicu: Public Citizen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Argus Leader Media v. Food Marketing Institute We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1346
Plaintiff - Appellee: Argus Leader Media, doing business as Argus Leader
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture
Intervenor Defendant - Appellant: Food Marketing Institute
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant(s): National Grocers Association
NACS, et al v. FRS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-5270
Plaintiff - Appellee: NACS, formerly known as National Association of Convenience Stores, National Retail Federation, Food Marketing Institute and others
Defendant - Appellant: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
NACS et al v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02075
Plaintiff: NACS , NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION , FOOD MARKETING INSTITUTE and others
Defendant: BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
-JO Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, et al v. Visa USA, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1996cv05238
Objector: Jeffrey Ledon DeWeese, M.D., 710 Corp., Armenta's Mexican Food, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: All Plaintiffs, Circuit City Stores, Inc., Food Marketing Institute and others
Respondent: Bennett II (Tennessee) and Ratner (Ohio) Plaintiffs
Intervenor Plaintiff: Roman Buholzer and Dow Jones And Company, Inc.
Interested Party: Citigroup, Inc., Edgar, Dunn and Company, Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company and others
Movant: Lead Counsel Constantine & Partners, Lead Counsel Constantine Cannon LLP and Lead Counsel Constantine Cannon PC
Defendant: Mastercard International, Inc. and Visa U.S.A., Inc.
Intervenor: TCF Financial Corporation
Creditor: Wells Fargo Retail Finance II, LLC
Special Master: Robin Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
New England Carpenters Health, et al v. First DataBank, Inc., et al
as 09-2380
Plaintiff - Appellee: NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, PIRELLI ARMSTRONG RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, PHILADELPHIA FEDERATION OF TEACHERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Interested Party - Appellant: HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
Petitioner - Appellee: JUNE SWAN
Defendant - Appellee: MCKESSON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
Defendant: FIRST DATABANK, INC., a Missouri Corporation
Interested Party: AMERISOURCEBERGEN, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, DEVILLE PHARMACIES, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVE and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC.
Type: Other Statutes RICO
New England Carpenters Health, et al v. First DataBank, Inc., et al
as 09-2381
Plaintiff - Appellee: NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, PIRELLI ARMSTRONG RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, TEAMSTERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and others
Interested Party - Appellant: NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INDUSTRY WELFARE FUND
Defendant - Appellee: MCKESSON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
Defendant: FIRST DATABANK, INC., a Missouri Corporation
Interested Party: AMERISOURCEBERGEN, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, DEVILLE PHARMACIES, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVE and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC.
Type: Other Statutes RICO
New England Carpenters Health, et al v. First DataBank, Inc., et al
as 09-2377
Plaintiff - Appellee: NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, PIRELLI ARMSTRONG RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, PHILADELPHIA FEDERATION OF TEACHERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Interested Party - Appellant: JULIE DIMINICO, Julie Diminico and LAURENCE LANDRIGAN, Laurence Landrigan
Defendant - Appellee: FIRST DATABANK, INC., a Missouri Corporation and MCKESSON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
Interested Party: AMERISOURCEBERGEN, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, DEVILLE PHARMACIES, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVE and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC.
Type: Other Statutes RICO
New England Carpenters Health, et al v. First DataBank, Inc., et al
as 09-2373
Plaintiff - Appellee: NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, PIRELLI ARMSTRONG RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, TEAMSTERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK and MICHELLE VRENKO
Defendant - Appellee: MCKESSON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
Defendant: FIRST DATABANK, INC., a Missouri Corporation
Interested Party: STOP & SHOP CO., AMERISOURCEBERGEN, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN and others
Amicus Curiae: PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVE and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC.
Type: Other Statutes RICO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?