Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Moonlight Mountain Recovery, Inc. v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Moonlight Mountain Recovery, Inc.
Defendant:
Justin McCoy, Eric Minnig, Corey Richardson and others
PayServices Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
as 1:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
PayServices Bank
Defendant:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Barrios v. Twin Falls City et al
as 1:2020cv00522
Plaintiff:
Francisco A Barrios
Defendant:
Twin Falls County and Twin Falls City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardona-Rodriguez v. Named Unknown Agents
as 1:2013cv00328
Defendant:
Named Unknown Agents
Plaintiff:
Francisco Cardona-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Habibullah v. Boise Chief of Police et al
as 1:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Hakim Habibullah
Defendant:
Boise Chief of Police, San Francisco Federal Bureau of Investigators, Dumas TX Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera-Suazo v. USA
as 1:2012cv00555
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Rivera-Suazo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ortiz v. Western District of Texas
as 1:2012cv00454
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ortiz
Defendant:
Western District of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gould et al v. Las Animas, Colorado County Court et al
as 1:2012cv00221
Plaintiff:
Russell Jay Gould and Steven Ray Fritts
Defendant:
Las Animas, Colorado County Court, Las Animas, Colorado Sheriffs Department, James W Casias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Rodriguez v. USA
as 4:2011cv00593
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Francisco Rodriguez-Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lopez v. State of Idaho
as 1:2009cv00641
Petitioner:
Francisco Angulo Lopez
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
