Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee: MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA, SARA BENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-705
Petitioner: STEVE OKSTAD, MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA and others
Respondent: SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC.
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner: SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent: ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Hebert et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv01394
Plaintiff: Jacques-Rene Hebert , Sara Benson , Carol Murphy and others
Defendant: Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Inc, Reynolds American Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chavez-Rocha v. No Named Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01767
Plaintiff: Francisco Chavez-Rocha
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vancelette v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 1:2013cv00598
Defendant: City of Albuquerque , Francisco Chavez , Aryls Lee and others
Plaintiff: Jason Vancelette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gil et al v. L & M Fuller Family Partnership et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv02684
Plaintiff: Abundio Contreras Gil, Abundio Contreras Gil, Roberto Arias Cabrera and others
Defendant: L & M Fuller Family Partnership, Lawrence Fuller, Martha Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?