Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Capozzi v. Thompson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00520
Petitioner: Frank J. Capozzi
Respondent: R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CAPOZZI v. GUBBIOTTI et al
as 1:2022cv01659
Petitioner: FRANK J. CAPOZZI
Respondent: WARDEN THOMAS GUBBIOTTI and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CAPOZZI v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv20262
Petitioner: FRANK J. CAPOZZI
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN LAMINE N'DIAYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CAPOZZI v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv19533
Petitioner: FRANK J. CAPOZZI
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Capozzi v. USA
as 3:2021cv01640
Petitioner: Frank J. Capozzi
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Frank Capozzi
as 21-1973
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK J. CAPOZZI
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Frank Capozzi
as 21-1771
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK J. CAPOZZI
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Frank Capozzi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2953
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK J. CAPOZZI
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: William Rohland
as 17-2940
Not Party - Petitioner: In re: WILLIAM ROHLAND
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Respondent: FRANK J. CAPOZZI, ROBERT S. MONACO and KRISANDRA STRAUSSER CAPOZZI
Nominal Respondent: JAMES M. MUNLEY
In re: William Rohland
as 17-2503
Not Party - Petitioner: In re: WILLIAM ROHLAND
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Respondent: FRANK J. CAPOZZI, ROBERT S. MONACO and KRISANDRA STRAUSSER CAPOZZI
Nominal Respondent: JAMES M. MUNLEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?