Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Doornbos v. Department of the Air Force
as 1:2023cv00900
Plaintiff: Margarita Doornbos
Defendant: Department of the Air Force and Frank Kendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00076
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00411
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6166
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00621
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miller et al v. United States Department of Defense Secretary et al
as 2:2022cv00118
Defendant: United States Department of Defense Secretary, United States Air Force Secretary, United States Air Force Surgeon General and others
Plaintiff: TSGT Nicholas Miller and TSGT Levi L Lindskog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beasley v. Kendall
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff: Teresa Beasley
Defendant: Frank Kendall, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00289
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?