Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. Grace Hou
as 24-1445
Petitioner:
FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Respondent:
GRACE HOU
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. Gregg Scott
as 22-1356
Applicant:
FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Respondent:
GREGG SCOTT
Walker v. Dept. of Human Services et al
as 1:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Frankie N. Walker, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept. of Human Services, Grace B. Hov, Office of Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Hou et al
as 1:2021cv02018
Respondent:
Grace B. Hou, Steve Bryant and Gregg Scott
Petitioner:
Frankie N. Walker, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Scott et al
as 4:2018cv04115
Plaintiff:
Frankie N Walker, Sr
Defendant:
Gregory Scott, James Dimas and Liberty Healthcare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Hughes et al
as 4:2018cv04035
Plaintiff:
Frankie N Walker, Sr
Defendant:
Kerryann Hughes, Sandra Simpson, Gregory Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. Gregory Scott
as 17-3251
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GREGORY SCOTT, Program Director at Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. Shan Jumper, et al
as 17-2596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAN JUMPER, GUY GROOT, JUDITH ROTH and others
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. James Clayton, et al
as 16-2898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES C. CLAYTON, Investigator/Internal Affairs and RYAN KERR, Security Therapist Aid
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. Sue Myerscough
as 16-1797
Petitioner:
FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Respondent:
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH
Party-in-Interest:
SHAN JUMPER, Clinical Director, (Liberty Healthcare employee), GUY GROOT, Team Leader (Liberty Healthcare employee), JUDITH ROTH, Clinical Therapist (Liberty Healthcare employee) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
