Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Franklin Reaves v. Sherry Rhode
as 11-1764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, PHD
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERRY R. RHODES, individually and in her official capacity as Clerk of Court for Marion County, MARK W. RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Marion County, LEVON NICHOLS, a/k/a Levern Nichols, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Marion County and others
Franklin Reaves v. Robert Stetson
as 11-1461
Appellant:
DONALD N. REAVES
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, PHd And All Others Similarly Situated and VASTENA REAVES, And All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT STETSON, individually and in his official capacity as Fire Chief and Building Inspector for City of Mullins, DANNY GARDNER, individually and in his official capacity as Marion County Employee, DENNIS FLOYD, individually and in his official capacity as Marion County Employee and others
Franklin Reaves v. Mullins Police Dept
as 11-1459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, VASTENA REAVES, DONALD N. REAVES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MULLINS POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARION COUNTY, TERRY B. STRICKLAND, individually and in his official capacity as member of Mullins City Council and others
Appellee:
W. KENNETH MCDONALD, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor
In re: Franklin Reave
as 10-2267
Petitioner:
In re: FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, PhD
:
, , and others
Reverend Reaves v. State of South Carolina
as 08-1235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REVEREND FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, FANNIE MELETTE, LAMAR MELETTE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Attorney General Henry McMaster
Defendant - None:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Civil Rights Division Voting Section, JOHN D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General, US Department of Justice, JOSEPH D. RICH, Chief US Department of Justice Civil Rights Division Voting Section and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
