Cases 31 - 40 of 116
Frederick Banks v. Mark Wietzman, et al
as 17-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK G. WIETZMAN, Esq., DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, United States Department of Justice and others
Banks v. Cessar, et al
as 17-1207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT CESSAR, DAVID HICKTON, DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Banks v. Hornak, et al
as 17-1189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK HORNAK, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MICHAEL POMPEO, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and others
Banks v. Eddy, et al
as 17-1197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CYNTHIA REED EDDY, MARK HORNAK, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Banks v. FBI, et al
as 17-1184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, ROBERT WERNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-35140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United Tribes of America, et al v. McKeesport Post Office, et al
as 16-4070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED TRIBES OF AMERICA and FREDERICK H. BANKS, AKA Noon Bear
Defendant - Appellee:
MCKEESPORT POST OFFICE, SENTENCING DESIGNATION AND COMPUTATION CENTER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS and others
Frederick Banks, et al v. Hilary Clinton, et al
as 16-56676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
HILARY RODHAM CLINTON, BRENDAN T. CONWAY, AUSA, JOHN BRENNAN, Director of Central Intelligence and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-14852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-14855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
