Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Eric Rhett v. Department of Community Affair, et al
as 20-1914
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE ESTHER SALAS, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, SHARON FREEMAN, Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC J. RHETT
John Reardon v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 20-1178
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE FREEMAN, of Camden County, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDGE MARGARET M. HAYDEN, of the State Appellate Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN E. REARDON
USA v. Samuel Freeman
as 19-3529
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMUEL FREEMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Grazyna Grezak v. Ropes & Gray LLP, et al
as 19-1856
Defendant:
GARBARINI & SCHER P.C. (G&S) and DARIUS A. MARZEC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAZYNA S. GREZAK
Defendant / Appellee:
MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE, AISHA BAMS, Court Deputy of Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman SDNY (Bams) and ROPES & GRAY, RP
In re: Samuel Freeman
as 19-1020
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: SAMUEL FREEMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Dennis Freeman
as 17-2114
Petitioner:
In re: DENNIS FREEMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Archie Armstrong v. USA, et al
as 16-4116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE G. ARMSTRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, D'ALTON, Officer, FREEMAN and others
Richard Joh v. Paul Suhey, et al
as 16-4010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JOH
Defendant:
PAUL SUHEY, D.O., WILLIAM YOUNG, FREEMAN, NURSE and others
In re: Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 16-3682
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP, a New Jersey corporation and subsidiary of STRYKER CORPORATION
Defendant - Respondent:
BRETT SARKISIAN, an individual, KEEGAN FREEMAN, an individual, MICHAEL NORDYKE, an individual and others
Nominal Respondent:
CLAIRE C. CECCHI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
