Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
FROST v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 7:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LERON FROST
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, JUDGE RICHARD M COWART and JULIA BAUN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FROST v. COWART et al
as 7:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LERON FROST
Defendant:
JUDGE RICHARD M COWART, JULIA BAUN and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. Daniel et al
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
William Benjamin Brown and Rosa D. Brown
Defendant:
Scottie Daniel, Joel B. Paskauskas, Marty C. Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plimpton v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01126
Plaintiff:
Theresa Anne Frost Plimpton
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clervrain v. Shafer et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Defendant:
Peter B. Rutledge, David Shafer, Yang Yuanqing and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FROST v. ETHICON, INC et al
as 1:2021cv02355
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc.
Plaintiff:
SHERRY FROST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
