Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Johnson v. PA Families Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01017
Plaintiff:
Daquan Johnson
Defendant:
Pa Families Inc, Loysville Youth Development Center and Brad Swisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. PA FAMILIES INC et al
as 2:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
DAQUON JOHNSON and DAQUAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
PA FAMILIES INC, LOYSVILLE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER and BRAD SWISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOMECSKO v. MURPHY FAMILY, INC.,
as 2:2021cv01081
Plaintiff:
JAMES TOMECSKO
Defendant:
MURPHY FAMILY, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02640
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Best et al v. Merakey USA et al
as 3:2019cv01124
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Merakey USA, Supportive Concepts For Families, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kimber M. Best and Victoria Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JMT FAMILY INC. v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2018cv03885
Plaintiff:
JMT FAMILY INC.
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUPPORTIVE CONCEPTS FOR FAMILIES, INC. v. EXETER TOWNSHIP et al
as 5:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
SUPPORTIVE CONCEPTS FOR FAMILIES, INC.
Defendant:
EXETER TOWNSHIP, EXETER TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, WILLIAM CHIP WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WENDELL H. STONE COMPANY, INC. v. GLENN FAMILY, INC
as 2:2016cv01218
Plaintiff:
WENDELL H. STONE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
GLENN FAMILY, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eaves-Voyles v. Almost Family, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02421
Plaintiff:
Tracey Eaves-Voyles
Defendant:
Almost Family, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. ALEXANDER et al
as 2:2015cv04868
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JERMAINE ALEXANDER and KEEP IN IT IN THE FAMILY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
