Cases 1 - 10 of 15
James Munson v. James Keller, et al
as 21-3008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES KELLER, in his official capacity as Food Service Manager for the Illinois Department of Corrections - substituted for Suzann Griswold-Bailey, MAGID FAHIM, Doctor, ADRIAN FEINERMAN, Doctor and others
Headrick v. Nurse Steph et al
as 4:2019cv00920
Defendant:
Fe Fuentes and Nurse Steph
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Headrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Headrick v. Glass et al
as 4:2018cv01696
Plaintiff:
Timothy Headrick
Defendant:
Nurse Jones, Fe Fuentes, Nurse Steph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Headrick v. Glass et al
as 4:2018cv01683
Plaintiff:
Timothy Headrick
Defendant:
Unknown Dahm, Unknown Troupe, Adrian Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Smith v. Fe Fuentes, et al
as 18-2342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
FE FUENTES, Doctor, MAGID FAHIM, Doctor, SAM NWAOBASI and others
Reginald Smith v. Fe Fuentes, et al
as 18-2233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
FE FUENTES, Doctor, MAGID FAHIM, Doctor, SAM NWAOBASI and others
Bilik v. Shearing et al
as 3:2016cv00821
Plaintiff:
Richard Bilik
Defendant:
Robert Shearing, M Moldenhauer, John Trost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contrell Plummer v. Wexford Health Sources, Incorp, et al
as 14-3314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONTRELL PLUMMER
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, MAGID FAHIM, Doctor, Medical Director of Menard and FE FUENTES, Doctor
Michael Blakes v. Linda Foutch, et al
as 14-2255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BLAKES
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA FOUTCH and FE FUENTES, Doctor
Edward Bryant v. Sam Nwaobasi, et al
as 14-1488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM NWAOBASI, FE FUENTES, Doctor, JOHN SHEPHERD, Doctor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
