Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Ronald Emrit v. FBI
as 20-1908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Charles Weinschenk v. Central Intelligence Agency, et al
as 20-1859
Defendant / Appellee:
NOBLESVILLE SCHOOLS, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES R. WEINSCHENK
William White v. Executive Office for United S, et al
as 20-1798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Ronald S. Emrit v. FBI
as 20-1675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Robert Johnson v. Paul May, et al
as 20-1225
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, ALICIA INGRAM, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Insurance Fraud Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Rick Leslie v. Indiana State Police Departmen, et al
as 19-1433
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LAFAYETTE INDIANA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICK LESLIE
Donna Pearson v. Barclay Bank, et al
as 18-1995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA K. PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BARCLAYS BANK, PLC, OF DELAWARE, CEO OF BARCLAY BANK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Frederick Banks v. Soo Song, et al
as 17-2841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOO SONG, SEAN LANGFORD, ROBERT WERNER and others
Ben Baker v. FBI
as 16-4188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEN BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Ahmad Khorrami v. Michael Rolince, et al
as 16-3520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AHMAD F. KHORRAMI
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL E. ROLINCE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JAMES DOYLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
