Cases 1 - 10 of 12
DORN v. BUDWICK et al
as 2:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAMES DEAN and THOMAS JAMES DORN
Defendant:
MARISSA BUDWICK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OTHER UNNAMED FBI AGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
JORDAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 3:2019cv00150
Defendant:
AT&T, BLAIR COUNTY COURTHOUSE, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIE JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 3:2018cv00246
Defendant:
UPMC AFFILIATES, AT&T, BLAIR COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIE JORDAN and SANDRA RICKABAUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. MABUS et al
as 2:2015cv00814
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
RAY MABUS, SAM ERHART, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 2:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DETAR v. METTING et al
as 2:2014cv01600
Plaintiff:
LEE DETAR
Defendant:
ERIKA METTING, CITY OF PITTSBURGH , FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BANKS v. SPROAT et al
as 2:2013cv00922
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
JIM SPROAT, CAROL TURLAC, REALTY COUNSELING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SCARNATI v. PA FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 2:2012cv01289
Plaintiff:
GLORIA E. SCARNATI
Defendant:
PA FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and MARIAN ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAMACHE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
GREG GAMACHE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
