Cases 21 - 30 of 48
BANKS v. MABUS et al
as 2:2015cv00814
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
RAY MABUS, SAM ERHART, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 2:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JIN v. EXECUTIVE BRANCH CHIEF et al
as 2:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
KANG HYONG JIN and HAE SOOK PARK
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE BRANCH CHIEF, JEH JOHNSON, SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DETAR v. METTING et al
as 2:2014cv01600
Plaintiff:
LEE DETAR
Defendant:
ERIKA METTING, CITY OF PITTSBURGH , FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2013cv02909
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Western Dist of PA, 3311 East Carson Street and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. SPROAT et al
as 2:2013cv00922
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
JIM SPROAT, CAROL TURLAC, REALTY COUNSELING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SCARNATI v. PA FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 2:2012cv01289
Plaintiff:
GLORIA E. SCARNATI
Defendant:
PA FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and MARIAN ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piskanin v. US Government et al
as 1:2012cv00909
Plaintiff:
Michael John Piskanin, Jr.
Defendant:
US Government, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
