Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Davis v. United States of America et al
as 6:2017cv03132
Plaintiff:
Cecil McDonald Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, M.D. Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradford v. USA et al
as 6:2017cv03061
Plaintiff:
Kennon Bradford
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Thomas Satterly
Interested_party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradford v. USA et al
as 6:2017cv03060
Plaintiff:
Kennon Bradford
Defendant:
USA and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv03504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Castellano-Ceja v. Sanders et al
as 6:2016cv03481
Plaintiff:
Carlos Castellano-Ceja
Defendant:
Linda Sanders, Gary Cooper and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Interested_party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lyons v. Sanders et al
as 6:2016cv03462
Plaintiff:
Deon Lorenzo Lyons
Defendant:
Linda Sanders, USMCFP Springfield Administration, Inspector General Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2016cv01083
Plaintiff:
Andra Dwight Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Triplett, PC v. United States
as 4:2016cv00861
Plaintiff:
Roy Triplett, PC
Defendant:
United States, Loretta Lynch, United State Department of Justice Assett Forfeiture Program and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sheldon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2016cv03015
Plaintiff:
Gary Thomas Sheldon
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Waseca Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen v. USA et al
as 6:2015cv03524
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Allen
Defendant:
USA, Barrack Obama, Brian Curtis Wimes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
