Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Joseph v. Johnson, et al
as 21-2143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STAR JOSEPH
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, KEVIN R. SWEAZEA, KEA W. RIGGS and others
Sharp v. Garza, et al
as 21-2127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
CARMEN E. GARZA, LAURA FASHING, MARTHA VAZQUEZ, District Director and others
Joseph v. Johnson, et al
as 21-2120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STAR JOSEPH
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, United States Chief District Judge, KEVIN R. SWEAZEA, United States Magistrate Judge, KEA W. RIGGS, United States District Judge and others
Joseph v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00895
Plaintiff:
Star Joseph
Defendant:
William P Johnson, Kevin R. Sweazea, Kea W. Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Garza et al
as 1:2021cv00879
Plaintiff:
Donald Sharp and Donald Thomas Sharp
Defendant:
Carmen E. Garza, Laura Fashing, Martha Vazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
Star Joseph
Defendant:
William P. Johnson, Kevin R. Sweazea, Kea W. Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLia v. United States DOJ, et al
as 21-5047
Defendant / Appellee:
MELODY NELSON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 10TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN WILLIAM DELIA
Akers v. Flannigan, et al
as 21-3019
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN SPROUL, Warden, SAM A. CROW, Federal judge, J. PHIL GILBERT, Federal judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Delia v. U.S. Dept. of Justice et al
as 4:2020cv00611
Defendant:
Melody Nelson, Linda A Epperley, Federal Judge Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Steven W Delia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Contreras v. Federal Judge et al
as 1:2020cv02683
Respondent:
Phillip J. Weiser, Federal Judge and Burtlow
Petitioner:
Darren Contreras
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
