Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Gaines v. KIN, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01768
Plaintiff:
Felicia Gaines
Defendant:
KIN, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pippins v. Rasco et al
as 3:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Pippins
Defendant:
Richardson Q Rasco, Steven Cliften and Felicia Pitre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Marti et al v. Wu et al
as 4:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Marti and Felicia Marti JT Ten
Defendant:
Yang Wu, Craig Webster, Yeelong Tan Balladon and others
Jones v. Woodforest National Bank
as 4:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Felicia N. Jones
Defendant:
Woodforest National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mitchel v. Pitre et al
as 4:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Eric V. Mitchel
Defendant:
Felicia Pitre, All Others Asociates, Texas Attorney General Child Support Division and others
Bhavsar v. Microvast Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar, Guillermo Marti and Felicia Marti JT Ten
Defendant:
Yang Wu, Craig Webster, Yeelong Tan Balladon and others
Dumes v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04319
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Joyce M. Green Dumes and Felicia Dumes Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
