Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Saunders v. Brinkema et al
as 1:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
Jerod L Saunders
Defendant:
Leonie M. Brinkema, Mark S Davis and Fernando Galindo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Ferebee v. Harris et al
as 7:2021cv00236
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris, Julia C. Dudley, Clayton Higgin(s), Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenza Gerald Ferebee, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson v. Galindo, et al
as 2:2012cv00429
Respondent:
Fernando Galindo and Tommy E. Miller
Petitioner:
Kevin A. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gregory Gary v. Robert McDonnell
as 12-6902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY T. GARY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT F. MCDONNELL, Governor, Virginia, BRYAN T. WORWOOD, City of Richmond Police, MICHELLE B. MITCHELL, Sheriff, City of Richmond Jail and others
Gary v. McDonnell, etc., et al
as 2:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Gary
Defendant:
Robert F. McDonnell, City of Richmond Police, Bryan T. Worwood, City of Richmond Jail Sheriff, Michelle B. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00649
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sutton v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia et al
as 2:2008cv00220
Plaintiff:
Troy R. Sutton
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Robert G. Doumar, Elaine Cavanach and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
