Cases 1 - 10 of 205
Gonzalez v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Felix Fernando Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Alfaro v. Garland
as 24-1896
Petitioner:
FERNANDO GONZALEZ-ALFARO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez-Romero v. Warden, Hillsborough County Jail
as 8:2024cv00616
Petitioner:
Fernando Gonzalez-Romero, General Agent and Gonzalez-Romero
Respondent:
Warden, Hillsborough County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Espitia v. Garland
as 21-297
Petitioner:
FERNANDO GONZALEZ-ESPITIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv01883
Petitioner:
Fernando Gonzalez
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Fernando Gonzalez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hopper et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2020cv02838
Plaintiff:
Linda Driscoll, Mark Hudson, Ronald Weckwerth and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Fernando Gonzalez, Michael Hunter, Jerry D White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gonzalez Evangelista v. Garland
as 21-6375
Petitioner:
JUAN FERNANDO GONZALEZ EVANGELISTA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv08758
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Medina Baca et al v. NB General Construction Corp. et al
as 7:2020cv04701
Plaintiff:
Leoncio Torres, Angel Fernando Gonzalez and Stalin Medina Baca
Defendant:
Byron Abzun and NB General Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
