Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Fernando v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv01742
Plaintiff:
Fernando Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Leonardo Lopez et al
as 2:2022cv01700
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Leonardo Lopez, Iris Lopez, Fernando Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Lopez v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
Fernando Lopez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Lopez, Sr. et al v. County of Santa Clara
as 5:2019cv02639
Plaintiff:
Maria Escobedo Ramirez and Fernando Lopez, Sr.
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Davis
as 1:2016cv07390
Petitioner:
Fernando Lopez
Respondent:
Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lopez v. Davis
as 1:2016cv05874
Respondent:
Ron Davis
Petitioner:
Fernando Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lopez Garcia et al v. Hunter et al
as 3:2015cv02846
Plaintiff:
Hector Manuel Lopez Garcia and Luis Fernando Lopez Garcia
Defendant:
Christopher Hunter, Does 1 through 50, Arian Linscott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b
The 2005 Hassan M. Arzy and Afshan Arzy Revocable Trust v. Lopez et al
as 2:2014cv07224
Defendant:
Does, Cedric Gladney and Fernando Lopez
Plaintiff:
The 2005 Hassan M. Arzy and Afshan Arzy Revocable Trust
Fernando Lopez-Llanos v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 8:2013cv00916
Movant:
Antonio Gnocchi-Franco
Plaintiff:
Fernando Lopez-Llanos
Interested Party:
Toyota Credit de Puerto Rico and Toyota de Puerto Rico Corp.
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
