Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Latchana et al v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02193
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight, Inc. and Keith David Kirksey
Plaintiff:
Fernando Ramirez Fabian and Malany Latchana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv
Ramirez et al v. Jason & Harry Food Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv06653
Defendant:
Jason & Harry Food Corp., Jason Kim, Harry H. Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Fernando Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Perez (Pena)
as 18-1042
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Geovanny Rodriguez-Perez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Manny, AKA Shorty, Daniel Fernandez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Jesus Sanchez, Sealed Defedant 3 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ariel Pena, AKA Bin, AKA Vin
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Perez
as 17-725
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Fernandez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Jesus Sanchez, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Miguel Cerda, AKA Sealed Defendant 4, AKA Manganzon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Manuel Geovanny Rodriguez-Perez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Manny, AKA Shorty
Ramirez v. Ricoh Americas Corporation
as 1:2013cv09073
Plaintiff:
Fernando Ramirez
Defendant:
Ricoh Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Monroe County Employees' Retirement System v. YPF Sociedad Anonima et al
as 1:2013cv00842
Plaintiff:
Monroe County Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
YPF Sociedad Anonima, Repsol YPF, S.A., Antonio Brufau Niubo and others
Movant:
Felix Portnoy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Diego v. Sanchez
as 1:2012cv02591
Plaintiff:
Fernando Ramirez Diego
Defendant:
Cristian Gomez Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 - INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION REMEDIES
Ortiz v. New York City Housing Authority et al
as 1:2009cv01280
Plaintiff:
Seoul Ortiz
Defendant:
New York City Housing Authority, Union Local 237, Kenny Kaye and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
