Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dropkin v. Blair et al
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Stuart Dropkin
Defendant:
Rainer M. Blair, Matt McGrew, Emmanuel Ligner and others
In re Danaher Corporation Derivative Litigation
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Nathan Silva and Stuart Dropkin
Defendant:
Rainer M. Blair, Feroz Dewan, Linda Filler and others
Green v. Behring et al
as 1:2020cv02258
Defendant:
John C Pope, Alexandre Van Damme, Gregory E. Abel and others
Plaintiff:
Ian Green
Hill v. Abel et al
as 1:2020cv02280
Defendant:
Alexandre Behring, Alexandre Van Damme, Marcel Herrmann Telles and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Kraft Heinz Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2020cv02259
Defendant:
Alexandre Van Damme, Gregory E. Abel, Marcel Herrmann Telles and others
Plaintiff:
Ian Green, Charlotte Hays, Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Waters v. Behring et al
as 1:2020cv02072
Defendant:
John C Pope, Marcel Hermann Telles, David H. Knopf and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
The Kraft Heinz Company
Plaintiff:
Dale Waters, Sjunde AP-Fonden and Union Asset Management Holding AG
Petitioner:
Richard Merritts
Merritts v. 3G Capital, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02071
Defendant:
David H. Knopf, 3G Capital Partners II LP, The Kraft Heinz Company and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Merritts, Sjunde AP-Fonden and Union Asset Management Holding AG
Waters v. Behring et al
as 1:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Marcel Hermann Telles, John C. Pope, David H. Knopf and others
Nominal Defendant:
The Kraft Heinz Company
Plaintiff:
Dale Waters
GREEN v. BEHRING et al
as 2:2019cv00613
Defendant:
JOHN C. POPE, ALEXANDRE VAN DAMME, GREGORY E. ABEL and others
Plaintiff:
IAN GREEN
SILVERMAN et al v. BEHRING et al
as 2:2019cv00574
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE HAYS and STEPHEN SILVERMAN
Defendant:
JOHN C. POPE, DAVID H. KNOPF, ALEXANDRE VAN DAMME and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
