Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1119
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1891
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-56079
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv21386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alieu Jatta v. Lowell Clark, et al
as 21-35083
Respondent:
LOWELL CLARK, Warden of Northwest Detention Center, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and NATHALIE ASHER, Tacoma Field Office Director Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
ALIEU JATTA
Kanat Umarbaev, et al v. Marc Moore, et al
as 20-10781
Petitioner / Appellant:
Patricia Esteban Ramon, Juan Francisco Portillo Hernandez, Jane Doe and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Marc J. Moore, Dallas Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jimmy Johnson, Warden, Prairieland Detention Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
