Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Taebel v. Field
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Kristen Field
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sherman v. Merrillville The Town of et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Chanel Sherman
Defendant:
Merrillville The Town of, Jesus Solis, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norman v. ABC Network et al
as 2:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
LaSandra Norman and Beyonce G Knowles
Defendant:
ABC Network, Soldier Field and Val Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Andrews Jr. v. Bokota et al
as 2:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Leon E Andrews Jr.
Defendant:
Natalie Bokota, Kathleen A. Sullivan, Mark Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Allen County DCS/CASA et al
as 1:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Zachary S Murphy
Defendant:
Allen County DCS/CASA, Danielle Corcoran, Brenda Coffel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MIB, LLC et al v. FIELD et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
MIB, LLC, RYAN POLOKOFF and SABINE KISSEE
Defendant:
MIKE FIELD, DAVE BURTNER, JIM HANLON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. FIELDS
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
NANEESHA BROWN
Defendant:
CARNELUIA FIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Fields v. Town of Merrillville et al
as 2:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
GEORGE FIELDS
Defendant:
TOWN OF MERRILLVILLE, TOWN OF MERRILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, FORMER CHIEF OF POLICE JOSEPH PETRUCH and others
Not Classified By Court:
Galen A Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
