Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Chica et al v. Fikes et al
as 1:2023cv03660
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Chica, Atlanta Property Medics LLC and Governor Brian Kemp
Defendant:
DEA Officer D. Fikes and United States
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Sylvin v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
Junior Sylvin
Respondent:
J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alvarado v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv03338
Petitioner:
Jesus Rivera Alvarado
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes, FCI Jessup and Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sylvin v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Junior Sylvin
Respondent:
J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sylvin v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00069
Petitioner:
Junior Sylvin
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mata-Arrevalo v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02433
Petitioner:
Eliel Mata-Arrevalo
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and Atlanta Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ordonez v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Ordonez, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dodge v. Fikes et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Austin Dodge
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. Warden Jeffrey Fikes
as 2:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Jeffrey White
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis, Jr. v. Carmarillo, et al
as 2:2023cv00049
Defendant:
Corey Davis, Jr., J. Carmarillo, P. Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
