Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BAKER v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY et al
as 3:2021cv16315
Plaintiff:
MELISSA BAKER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, JUDGE TIMOTHY P. LYNDON, DEPUTY GENERAL SAMUEL FILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 13 et al
as 4:2020cv01313
Defendant:
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 13 and David R. Fillman
Plaintiff:
Ralph R. Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ABI-HANNA et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2019cv17837
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TREZZA, ROSE M. CAMPANARO, HAROLD CAREY and others
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Wessner v. American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 13 et al
as 1:2019cv00537
Defendant:
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 13, Michael Newsome, David R. Fillman and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy C. Wessner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neely v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 13 et al
as 1:2018cv02043
Defendant:
David R. Fillman, Sharon P. Minnich, Thomas W. Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
William H. Neely, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv07037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
