Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Fizer v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08469
Plaintiff:
Terrance A Fizer
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Harold Palmer, V
Defendant:
David Shinn, Core Civic, Bruno Stolc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Cruz v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
David De La Cruz
Defendant:
David Shinn, CoreCivic, Bruno Stolc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fizer v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Gary Fizer
Defendant:
David Shinn and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Outley v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00084
Defendant:
T Degard, David Shinn, Greg Fizer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Outley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer et al v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00028
Plaintiff:
Lederius Franklin, Firman Bingham and Lemuel H Palmer
Defendant:
Greg Fizer, Donald Hendricks, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis Grandinetti, II v. Erica Barajas, et al
as 19-17403
Defendant / Appellee:
COTTON, mental health worker, GRIFFIN, Nurse, DE OLEO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Grandinetti v. Barajas et al
as 1:2019cv00569
Defendant:
Patterson, Goedecke, Angela Akuwagu and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Fierro v. Keith Smith, et al
as 19-16786
Defendant:
M. ESPINOZA, C.O. IV/ Grievance Coordinator at Central Unit - Florence, MALACHINSKI, MOLERA, C.O. II and others
Defendant / Appellee:
L. FORESTER, D.W., KEITH SMITH, Security Operations Administrator at Phoenix Division Director's Office, PANANN DAYS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE ABEL FIERRO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
