Cases 21 - 30 of 53
STEVENS v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE et al
as 4:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
SIR' JAMEZ STEVENS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE , NEKAWAHKEE, INC and RONALD WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GROOMES v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE
as 4:2013cv00173
Plaintiff:
KANESHA GROOMES
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Clever v. The State Of Florida, Department Of Juvenile Justice et al
as 3:2012cv00965
Plaintiff:
John Clever
Defendant:
The State Of Florida, Department Of Juvenile Justice , G4S Youth Services, LLC. , Arthur L. Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
