Cases 1 - 10 of 185
John Newsome v. Reginald Floyd
as 24-6283
Plaintiff:
JOHN RICHARD NEWSOME
Defendant:
REGINALD FLOYD, K. JEFFORDS and C. SPAZIANI
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff:
KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
John Floyd v. City of Spartanburg
as 24-1255
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. FLOYD and GORDON FARMS, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
CITY OF SPARTANBURG
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. D.O.C. Commissioner
as 24-6028
Plaintiff:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant:
D.O.C. COMMISSIONER, ANNIE HARVEY, Commissioner and CLEVELAND FRIDAY
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Fredrick Abello
as 24-6003
Plaintiff:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant:
WARDEN FREDRICK ABELLO, CHIEF OF SECURITY TYRELL WILSON and CORPORAL HUMPHREY ADUSEI
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Prince Talo
as 23-7283
Plaintiff:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant:
RN PRINCE TALO and DR. MULUGETA B. AKAL
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Shane Weber
as 23-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SHANE WEBER, CHIEF OF SECURITY KEITH ARNOLD, LT. JAMES SMITH and others
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Nicholas Enyioma
as 23-7051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS ENYIOMA, Captain, AMOS OGUNBIYI, Lieutentant and OMOLADE OYEKOYA, Correctional Officer
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Thomas Williams
as 23-7002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
HEARING OFFICER THOMAS WILLIAMS and CORPORAL ADEWALE KASSIM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
