Cases 1 - 10 of 46
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, DAN FOREMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 1:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GUILIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TUMEY v. FLOYD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 4:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
KEVIN R. TUMEY, SR.
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION and NEW ALBANY (FLOYD COUNTY) POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
REITER et al v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER REITER and TIFFANY NAPIER
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARRID, BRADLEY KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
