Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Floyd et al v. Ray
as 4:2023cv04305
Plaintiff:
Dawn F Floyd and Allen W Floyd
Defendant:
Daniel Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Floyd v. Clinton Newberry Natural Gas Authority
as 6:2022cv04141
Plaintiff:
Christopher Floyd
Defendant:
Clinton Newberry Natural Gas Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Brett v. Blume et al
as 3:2018cv01860
Defendant:
Mr. Schneider, Bill Baronse, Robert Rockwell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isioye v. Coastal Carolina University et al
as 4:2017cv03484
Defendant:
Coastal Carolina University, David DeCenzo, Coastal Carolina Public Safety Officer John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Oluwasegun Israel Isioye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd [Gallman] v. Department of Justice
as 3:2017cv02653
Plaintiff:
blondell-elizabeth Floyd [Gallman]
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyles v. Union County Schools
as 7:2016cv00550
Plaintiff:
Floyd Lyles, Jr
Defendant:
Union County Schools and Kristi Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singletary v. North Charleston, The City of et al
as 2:2015cv04463
Plaintiff:
John G Singletary, Jr
Defendant:
North Charleston, The City of, North Charleston Police Department, Keith Summey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv01971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Causey v. Myrtle Beach, City of et al
as 4:2013cv00970
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Floyd Causey
Defendant:
Myrtle Beach, City of, Myrtle Beach Police Department, City of, M Paitsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
